QJF M95

QJF M95

QJF
35 Overall Score
vs
JLab Jbuds Pods EBJBPODSRBLK124

JLab Jbuds Pods EBJBPODSRBLK124

JLab
87 Overall Score

What Buyers Say

QJF M95

72 out of 100 low confidence 8 reviews

The M95 open-ear earbuds are praised for their comfort, lightweight design, and impressive battery life, especially given the low price point. However, several users report significant issues with call quality, connectivity problems, and overly sensitive touch controls. While they excel for music and podcasts, they are not recommended for heavy phone use.

Pros
  • Comfortable and lightweight design
  • Impressive battery life
  • Great sound quality for music and podcasts
  • Secure fit during workouts
  • Excellent value for the price
Cons
  • Poor call quality
  • Connectivity issues
  • Overly sensitive touch controls
  • Loud low-battery beep
  • No battery level indicator
👍 Comfort 6
👍 Battery life 5
👍 Value for money 5
👎 Call quality 4
👎 Connectivity 2
👎 Touch controls 2

JLab Jbuds Pods EBJBPODSRBLK124

88 out of 100 medium confidence 13 reviews

The JLab JBuds Pods ANC earbuds are highly praised for their excellent value, offering a rich feature set at a budget-friendly price. Users consistently highlight the comfortable fit, long battery life, and good sound quality, though some note the ANC is decent but not top-tier. The JLab app adds customization options like EQ and touch controls, and features like wireless charging and multipoint Bluetooth are well-received. A few users mention the need to select the right ear tips for optimal sound and a minor app pairing quirk.

Pros
  • Excellent value for money
  • Comfortable fit
  • Long battery life
  • Good sound quality
  • Wireless charging support
Cons
  • ANC is decent but not top-tier
  • Earbuds may fall out during activity
  • App pairing quirk on iPhone
  • Short USB-C cable included
  • Need to select correct ear tips for optimal sound
👍 Value for money 5
👍 Battery life 4
👍 Sound quality 5
👍 Comfort 4
🤔 Anc performance 3
🤔 App functionality 4

Scores

Budget
QJF
47
JLab
86
Gaming
QJF
31
JLab
85
Commute
QJF
29
JLab
82
Travel
QJF
31
JLab
80
Calls
QJF
24
JLab
79
Fitness
QJF
30
JLab
77
Music
QJF
26
JLab
69

Specifications

QJF M95JLab Jbuds Pods EBJBPODSRBLK124
Design
Form Factoropen-earin-ear
Wearing Styleear-hookstem
Ear Tips—3 sets of gel tips
Weight0.05 kg★0.12 kg
Audio
Driver Type—dynamic
Driver Size—11 mm★
Drivers—1★
Freq Min—20 Hz★
Freq Max—20 kHz★
Impedance16 Ω—
Hi-Res Audio—✗
CodecsOpen Ear Earbuds Pink for Women, Bluetooth 5.4 Wireless Headphones for Small Ears, Air Conduction Comfort Fit, 50H Playtime, IP54 Sweatproof, Touch Control for Running Cycling WorkSBC, AAC
Noise Control
ANC—✓★
ANC Type—hybrid
Transparency—✓★
Connectivity
Wireless✓✓
Bluetooth5.45.4
Multipoint—✓★
Earbud Battery
Battery Life8 hrs10 hrs★
Charge Time—0.16699999570846558 hrs★
Fast Charging—10 min for 2 hours playback
ChargingUSB-CUSB-C
Case Battery
Case Battery60 hrs★56 hrs
Case ChargingUSB-CUSB-C
Wireless Charging—✓★
Microphone
Microphone✓✓
Mic Count—6★
NC Mic—✓★
Features
Voice Assistant—Google Assistant
Touch Controls✓✓
App—Jlab App
Gaming Mode—✓★
Bone Conduction—✗
Water ResistanceIP54IP55

Pros & Cons

QJF M95

  • Strong battery (89th percentile)89th %ile
  • Strong comfort (72nd percentile)
  • Strong social proof (67th percentile)
  • Strong connectivity (66th percentile)
  • Below average sound (28th percentile)
  • Below average anc (31st percentile)
  • Below average user sentiment (33rd percentile)
  • Below average build (34th percentile)

JLab Jbuds Pods EBJBPODSRBLK124

  • Strong mic (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong connectivity (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong battery (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Strong anc (93rd percentile)93rd %ile

Verdict

★ Winner: JLab Jbuds Pods EBJBPODSRBLK124

Scores 87 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 13 of 34 specs.

JLab Jbuds Pods EBJBPODSRBLK124 Better at:

CallsMusicBudgetGamingTravelCommuteFitness