Technics EAH-AZ100-N

Technics EAH-AZ100-N

Technics
100 Overall Score
vs
Panasonic Ergofit RP-TCM125-W

Panasonic Ergofit RP-TCM125-W

Panasonic
34 Overall Score

Scores

Calls
Technics
99
Panasonic
18
Travel
Technics
97
Panasonic
18
Budget
Technics
90
Panasonic
36
Music
Technics
89
Panasonic
21
Commute
Technics
89
Panasonic
16
Gaming
Technics
87
Panasonic
19
Fitness
Technics
79
Panasonic
14

Specifications

Technics EAH-AZ100-NPanasonic Ergofit RP-TCM125-W
Design
Form Factorin-earin-ear
Wearing Styletrue wireless
Ear TipsExtra large, Large, Medium, Smallsmall, medium, large
Weight0.05 kg
Audio
Driver Typedynamicneodymium
Driver Size10 mm9 mm
Drivers1
Freq Min20 Hz10 Hz
Freq Max40 kHz24 kHz
Impedance16 Ω
Sensitivity97 dB
Hi-Res Audio
CodecsAAC, LC3, LDAC, SBC
SurroundDolby Atmos
Noise Control
ANC
ANC Typeadaptive
Transparency
Connectivity
Wireless
Bluetooth5.3
ProfilesAVRCP, A2DP, HSP, HFP, TMAP, PBP
Multipoint
Wired ConnectorBluetooth
Range10 m
Earbud Battery
Battery Life8 hrs
Charge Time2.5 hrs
Fast Charging15 min. for 90 min. playback
ChargingUSB-C
Case Battery
Case Battery28 hrs
Case ChargingUSB-C
Wireless Charging
Microphone
Microphone
Mic Count6
NC Mic
Features
Voice AssistantGoogle Assistant, Siri
Touch Controls
AppAndroid & iOS
Volume Limiting
Gaming Mode
Bone Conduction
Water ResistanceIPX4

Pros & Cons

Technics EAH-AZ100-N

  • Strong connectivity (100th percentile)100th %ile
  • Strong sound (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong anc (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong mic (97th percentile)97th %ile

Panasonic Ergofit RP-TCM125-W

  • Strong user sentiment (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Below average connectivity (14th percentile)14th %ile
  • Below average comfort (28th percentile)
  • Below average anc (32nd percentile)
  • Below average build (35th percentile)

Verdict

Winner: Technics EAH-AZ100-N

Scores 100 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 20 of 40 specs.

Technics EAH-AZ100-N Better at:

CallsMusicBudgetGamingTravelCommuteFitness