Samsung EHS64AVFWE 3.5mm Stereo

Samsung EHS64AVFWE 3.5mm Stereo

Samsung
44 Overall Score
vs
Technics EAH-AZ100-K

Technics EAH-AZ100-K

Technics
100 Overall Score

Scores

Calls
Samsung
48
Technics
99
Travel
Samsung
40
Technics
98
Budget
Samsung
46
Technics
92
Music
Samsung
26
Technics
89
Commute
Samsung
39
Technics
89
Gaming
Samsung
37
Technics
87
Fitness
Samsung
48
Technics
80

Specifications

Samsung EHS64AVFWE 3.5mm StereoTechnics EAH-AZ100-K
Design
Form Factorin-ear
Wearing Styleover-ear cupstrue wireless
Ear Tipss5 x Eartip Pairs
Weight0.00 kg0.05 kg
Audio
Driver Typedynamicdynamic
Driver Size3.5 mm10 mm
Drivers1
Freq Min20 Hz
Freq Max40 kHz
Sensitivity94 dB
Hi-Res Audio
CodecsAAC, LC3, LDAC, SBC
SurroundDolby Atmos
Noise Control
ANC
ANC Typeadaptive
Transparency
Connectivity
Wireless
Bluetooth5.3
ProfilesAVRCP, A2DP, HSP, HFP, TMAP, PBP
Multipoint
Wired Connector3.5mmBluetooth
Range10 m
Earbud Battery
Battery Life8 hrs
Charge Time2.5 hrs
Fast Charging15 min. for 90 min. playback
ChargingUSB-C
Case Battery
Case Battery28 hrs
Case ChargingUSB-C
Wireless Charging
Microphone
Microphone
Mic Count6
NC Mic
Features
Touch Controls
AppAndroid & iOS
Volume Limiting
Gaming Mode
Bone Conduction
Water ResistanceWater-ResistantIPX4

Pros & Cons

Samsung EHS64AVFWE 3.5mm Stereo

  • Strong comfort (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Strong social proof (90th percentile)90th %ile
  • Strong anc (74th percentile)
  • Strong build (72nd percentile)
  • Below average sound (2nd percentile)2nd %ile
  • Below average user sentiment (31st percentile)

Technics EAH-AZ100-K

  • Strong connectivity (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong sound (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong anc (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong mic (97th percentile)97th %ile

Verdict

Winner: Technics EAH-AZ100-K

Scores 100 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 18 of 38 specs.

Technics EAH-AZ100-K Better at:

CallsMusicBudgetGamingTravelCommuteFitness