AOOSTAR GEM12 MAX

AOOSTAR GEM12 MAX

AOOSTAR
64 Overall Score
vs
HP OMEN GT16-0364 Panda Metal 2025

HP OMEN GT16-0364 Panda Metal 2025

HP
96 Overall Score

Scores

Gaming
AOOSTAR
15
HP
91
Creator
AOOSTAR
25
HP
87
Developer
AOOSTAR
62
HP
87
Home Office
AOOSTAR
64
HP
87
Business
AOOSTAR
55
HP
87
Workstation
AOOSTAR
55
HP
86
Ai Llm
AOOSTAR
28
HP
67
Compact
AOOSTAR
64
HP
30

Specifications

AOOSTAR GEM12 MAXHP OMEN GT16-0364
Processor
CPUAMD Ryzen 7AMD Ryzen 7 8700F★
CPU Multi-Core ScoreNo data
30,931
Cores88
Frequency3.8 GHz4.1 GHz★
L3 Cache—16 MB★
Graphics
GPU*AMD Radeon 780MNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070★
GPU Benchmark Score
5,939
28,703
Typeintegrated★discrete
VRAM—12 GB★
VRAM TypeSharedGDDR7
Memory & Storage
RAM24 GB32 GB★
RAM GenerationDDR5DDR5
Storage 11 TB1 TB★
Storage 1 TypeNVMe SSD★SSD
Build
Form Factorminimid-tower
PSU120W850W★
Weight0.66 kg14.50 kg
Connectivity
USB-C Ports22
USB Ports48★
Thunderbolt—0
HDMI1x HDMI1 x HDMI
DisplayPort1x DP3 x DisplayPort
Wi-FiWi-Fi 6Wi-Fi 6
BluetoothBluetooth 5.2Bluetooth 5.3★
Ethernet2.5GbEGigabit Ethernet
System
OS—Windows 11 Home

Pros & Cons

AOOSTAR GEM12 MAX

  • Strong cpu (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong social proof (75th percentile)
  • Strong ram (70th percentile)
  • Strong port selection (68th percentile)
  • Below average reliability (12th percentile)12th %ile

HP OMEN GT16-0364 Panda Metal 2025

  • Strong social proof (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong user sentiment (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong port selection (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong ram (88th percentile)88th %ile

Pricing

AOOSTAR GEM12 MAX

HP OMEN GT16-0364 Panda Metal 2025

No current pricing available

Verdict

★ Winner: HP OMEN GT16-0364

Scores 96 overall, wins 7 of 8 usage categories and 12 of 26 specs.

AOOSTAR GEM12 MAX Better at:

Compact

HP OMEN GT16-0364 Better at:

Ai LlmGamingCreatorBusinessDeveloperHome OfficeWorkstation

Also Consider