Intel Core Ultra 9 285K 24-core LGA1851

Intel Core Ultra 9 285K 24-core LGA1851

Intel
98 Overall Score
vs
AMD FX-Series FX-4100 4-core AMD Socket AM4

AMD FX-Series FX-4100 4-core AMD Socket AM4

AMD
59 Overall Score

What Buyers Say

Intel Core Ultra 9 285K 24-core LGA1851

88 out of 100 high confidence 32 reviews

The Intel Core Ultra 9 285K is overwhelmingly praised for its raw performance, especially in 4K gaming and heavy multitasking, with users noting significant upgrades from older CPUs. It runs cool with proper cooling solutions, and its efficiency and support for DDR5 and PCIe 5.0 are highlighted as major advantages. Some mention that it may not beat AMD in 1080p/1440p gaming, but it excels at 4K and productivity. A few note the lack of a cooler and tray packaging as minor drawbacks, but overall sentiment is very positive.

Pros
  • Excellent 4K gaming performance
  • Strong multitasking and productivity
  • Runs cool with proper cooling
  • Supports DDR5 and PCIe 5.0
  • Power efficient (125W TDP)
Cons
  • No cooler included
  • Tray packaging (no retail box)
  • May lag AMD in 1080p/1440p gaming
  • Requires BIOS adjustments for best performance
  • Premium price
👍 Gaming performance 8
👍 Multitasking productivity 6
👍 Thermal management 5
👍 Power efficiency 4
👍 Memory support 4
👍 Value for money 3

AMD FX-Series FX-4100 4-core AMD Socket AM4

82 out of 100 medium confidence 15 reviews

The AMD FX-4100 is praised for its excellent value, solid gaming performance in DX11 titles, and strong overclocking potential. Users highlight its low power consumption and quiet cooler, though some received damaged units or tray versions instead of boxed ones. Synthetic benchmarks lag behind competitors, but real-world gaming results impress, especially with Radeon 6000 series GPUs.

Pros
  • Excellent value for money
  • Strong DX11 gaming performance
  • Great overclocking potential
  • Low power consumption
  • Quiet stock cooler
Cons
  • Fragile pins, risk of damage
  • Some received tray version instead of boxed
  • Synthetic benchmarks lag behind competitors
  • New architecture not supported by all apps
  • Stock cooler adequate but basic
👍 Value for money 6
👍 Gaming performance 5
👍 Overclocking potential 4
👍 Power consumption 2
🤔 Stock cooler 4
👎 Pin fragility 2

Scores

Ai Llm
Intel
100
AMD
50
Budget
Intel
100
AMD
59
Productivity
Intel
100
AMD
63
Gaming
Intel
90
AMD
58
Efficiency
Intel
85
AMD
58
Server
Intel
84
AMD
47

Specifications

Intel Core Ultra 9 285KAMD FX-Series FX-4100
Processor
BrandIntelAMD
SeriesCore Ultra 9FX-Series
Model285K4100
CodenameArrow Lake-SZambezi
Classdesktopdesktop
Process3★32
Cores & Clocks
Cores24★4
P-cores8★4
E-cores16★—
Threads24★4
Base Clock
4,600
3,600
Boost Clock
5,700
3,800
Cache
L2 Cache40★4
L3 Cache36★8
Performance
PassMark Multi
67,259
11,040
PassMark Single
5,087
2,533
Memory
Memory TypeDDR5★DDR3
Max Speed
6,400
1,866
Channels22
Max Memory
192
No data
ECC✓★✗
Platform & Power
SocketLGA 1851Socket AM3+
PCIe5.03.0
PCIe Lanes24★8
TDP12595★
Max Turbo Power250★—
Unlocked✓✓
Graphics & AI
Integrated GraphicsIntel Graphics—
NPU TOPS13★—

Pros & Cons

Intel Core Ultra 9 285K 24-core LGA1851

  • Strong feature (100th percentile)100th %ile
  • Strong single thread (100th percentile)100th %ile
  • Strong efficiency (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong multi thread (97th percentile)97th %ile

AMD FX-Series FX-4100 4-core AMD Socket AM4

  • Strong social proof (75th percentile)
  • Strong feature (75th percentile)
  • Strong single thread (71st percentile)

Pricing

Intel Core Ultra 9 285K 24-core LGA1851

AMD FX-Series FX-4100 4-core AMD Socket AM4

No current pricing available

Verdict

★ Winner: Intel Core Ultra 9 285K

Scores 98 overall, wins 6 of 6 usage categories and 18 of 29 specs.

Intel Core Ultra 9 285K Better at:

Ai LlmBudgetGamingServerEfficiencyProductivity

Also Consider