fosa1 fosa4ycn78izud
fosa1
26 Overall Score
vs
Intel Celeron G3900 2-core LGA1151
Intel
29 Overall Score
What Buyers Say
fosa1 fosa4ycn78izud
No customer feedback yet
Intel Celeron G3900 2-core LGA1151
50 out of 100 low confidence 6 reviews
The product receives mixed feedback. Some users praise it as simple, effective, and reliable for basic builds, while others report it arrived without a fan or failed to work at all. Packaging and quality control issues are noted, but for those who got a functional unit, it performs well.
Pros
- Simple and effective
- Reliable for basic builds
- Good value for money
- Works well with CPU
Cons
- Does not include a fan
- Packaging issues
- Some units arrived defective
- Quality control concerns
Functionality 6
Packaging 2
Value for money 2
Included accessories 1
Reliability 3
Ease of use 2
Scores
Budget
Productivity
Efficiency
Gaming
Server
Ai Llm
Specifications
| fosa1 fosa4ycn78izud | Intel Celeron G3900 | |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | ||
| Brand | Intel | Intel |
| Series | — | Celeron |
| Model | X5650 | G3900 |
| Class | desktop | desktop |
| Cores & Clocks | ||
| Cores | 6★ | 2 |
| Threads | 12★ | 2 |
| Base Clock | ||
| Boost Clock | No data | |
| Cache | ||
| L2 Cache | — | 0.5★ |
| L3 Cache | 12★ | — |
| Performance | ||
| PassMark Multi | No data | |
| Memory | ||
| Memory Type | DDR3 | DDR4★ |
| Max Speed | No data | |
| Channels | 3★ | — |
| Max Memory | No data | |
| ECC | ✓ | ✓ |
| Platform & Power | ||
| Socket | LGA1366 | LGA 1151 |
| TDP | 95 | 51★ |
| Unlocked | — | ✗ |
| Graphics & AI | ||
| Integrated Graphics | — | Intel HD Graphics 510 |
Pros & Cons
fosa1 fosa4ycn78izud
- Strong platform (65th percentile)
- Below average feature (20th percentile)20th %ile
- Below average multi thread (25th percentile)
- Below average efficiency (25th percentile)
- Below average ai (26th percentile)
Intel Celeron G3900 2-core LGA1151
- Strong social proof (69th percentile)
- Below average user sentiment (3rd percentile)3rd %ile
- Below average ai (22nd percentile)
- Below average multi thread (24th percentile)
- Below average efficiency (28th percentile)
Verdict
Winner: Intel Celeron G3900
Scores 29 overall, wins 6 of 6 usage categories and 5 of 20 specs.