Intel Core Ultra 7 265F 20-core LGA1851

Intel Core Ultra 7 265F 20-core LGA1851

Intel
87 Overall Score
vs
HP Celeron N4500 2-core Intel BGA 1338

HP Celeron N4500 2-core Intel BGA 1338

HP
17 Overall Score

Scores

Efficiency
Intel
99
HP
24
Budget
Intel
94
HP
17
Productivity
Intel
94
HP
16
Ai Llm
Intel
90
HP
14
Gaming
Intel
80
HP
17
Server
Intel
76
HP
14

Specifications

Intel Core Ultra 7 265FHP Celeron N4500
Processor
BrandIntelIntel
SeriesCore Ultra 7Celeron
Model265FN4500
CodenameArrow LakeJasper Lake
Classdesktoplaptop
Process3★10
Cores & Clocks
Cores20★2
P-cores8★2
E-cores12★—
Threads20★2
Base Clock
2,400
1,100
Boost Clock
5,300
2,800
Cache
L2 Cache36★3
L3 Cache30★4
Performance
PassMark Multi
49,522
No data
PassMark Single
4,757
No data
Memory
Memory TypeDDR5★DDR4
Max Speed
6,400
2,933
Channels2★—
Max Memory
256
No data
ECC✗✗
Platform & Power
SocketLGA1851Intel BGA 1338
PCIe5.03.0
PCIe Lanes24★8
TDP656★
Max Turbo Power18220★
Unlocked✗✗
Graphics & AI
Integrated GraphicsNoneIntel UHD Graphics
NPU TOPS3.5★—

Pros & Cons

Intel Core Ultra 7 265F 20-core LGA1851

  • Strong efficiency (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong single thread (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong multi thread (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong ai (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
  • Below average user sentiment (22nd percentile)

HP Celeron N4500 2-core Intel BGA 1338

  • Below average social proof (6th percentile)6th %ile
  • Below average multi thread (12th percentile)12th %ile
  • Below average ai (18th percentile)18th %ile
  • Below average single thread (31st percentile)

Pricing

Intel Core Ultra 7 265F 20-core LGA1851

HP Celeron N4500 2-core Intel BGA 1338

No current pricing available

Verdict

★ Winner: Intel Core Ultra 7 265F

Scores 87 overall, wins 6 of 6 usage categories and 17 of 29 specs.

Intel Core Ultra 7 265F Better at:

Ai LlmBudgetGamingServerEfficiencyProductivity