fanxiang S910 Pro
fanxiang
83 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Ridata A801
Ridata
51 Gesamtbewertung
Bewertungen
Laptop
Workstation
Budget
Gaming
Console
Portable
Spezifikationen
| fanxiang S910 Pro | Ridata A801 | |
|---|---|---|
| Drive | ||
| Capacity | ||
| Form Factor | M.2 2280 | M.2 2280 |
| Interface | PCIe 5.0 x4 | PCIe 4.0 x4 |
| Protocol | NVMe | NVMe |
| PCIe Generation | 5★ | 4 |
| External | ✗ | ✗ |
| Performance | ||
| Sequential Read (MB/s) | ||
| Sequential Write (MB/s) | ||
| Hardware | ||
| NAND | TLC | TLC |
| DRAM Cache | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Reliability | ||
| Endurance (TBW) | Keine Daten | |
| Warranty (years) | 5 | 5 |
| Features | ||
| Heatsink | ✗ | ✗ |
| Hardware Encryption | ✓★ | — |
Vor- & Nachteile
fanxiang S910 Pro
- Strong feature (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong speed (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong endurance (90th percentile)90th %ile
- Strong random (80th percentile)80th %ile
Ridata A801
- Below average capacity (26th percentile)
Preise
fanxiang S910 Pro0.043Score pro Dollar
vs
Ridata A8010.056Score pro Dollar
Ridata A801 bietet 1.3x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
Fazit
Gewinner: fanxiang S910 Pro
Scores 83 overall, wins 6 of 6 usage categories and 7 of 14 specs.
