Ediloca EN680E 128GB PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

Ediloca EN680E 128GB PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

Ediloca
41 Gesamtbewertung
vs
KingSpec ONEBOOM X400 1TB PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

KingSpec ONEBOOM X400 1TB PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

KingSpec
73 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Budget
Ediloca
62
KingSpec
80
Laptop
Ediloca
32
KingSpec
76
Gaming
Ediloca
33
KingSpec
70
Console
Ediloca
16
KingSpec
68
Workstation
Ediloca
38
KingSpec
67
Portable
Ediloca
9
KingSpec
19

Spezifikationen

Ediloca EN680EKingSpec ONEBOOM X400
Drive
Capacity
128
1,000
Form FactorM.2 2280M.2 2280
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x4PCIe 4.0 x4
ProtocolNVMeNVMe
PCIe Generation34★
External✗✗
Performance
Sequential Read (MB/s)
1,130
7,400
Sequential Write (MB/s)
400
6,600
Random Read (IOPS)Keine Daten
710,000
Random Write (IOPS)Keine Daten
610,000
Hardware
NANDTLCTLC
DRAM Cache✗✗
Reliability
Endurance (TBW)Keine Daten
600
MTBF (hours)Keine Daten
1,000,000
Warranty (years)33
Features
Heatsink✗✗
Hardware Encryption✓★—

Vor- & Nachteile

Ediloca EN680E 128GB PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

  • Strong affordability (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong feature (79th percentile)
  • Below average capacity (7th percentile)7th %ile

KingSpec ONEBOOM X400 1TB PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

  • Strong speed (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong random (89th percentile)89th %ile
  • Strong endurance (80th percentile)80th %ile

Fazit

★ Gewinner: KingSpec ONEBOOM X400

Scores 73 overall, wins 6 of 6 usage categories and 8 of 17 specs.

KingSpec ONEBOOM X400 Besser bei:

BudgetGamingLaptopConsolePortableWorkstation