SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100 8TB PCIe 5.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100 8TB PCIe 5.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

SanDisk
89 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Samsung T7 500GB Portable USB 3.2 Gen 2

Samsung T7 500GB Portable USB 3.2 Gen 2

Samsung
42 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Console
SanDisk
86
Samsung
14
Workstation
SanDisk
85
Samsung
44
Gaming
SanDisk
84
Samsung
25
Laptop
SanDisk
65
Samsung
18
Budget
SanDisk
57
Samsung
29
Portable
SanDisk
23
Samsung
56

Spezifikationen

SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100Samsung T7
Drive
Capacity
8,000
500
Form FactorM.2 2280External
InterfacePCIe 5.0 x4USB 3.2 Gen 2
ProtocolNVMeNVMe
PCIe Generation5★—
External✗✓
Performance
Sequential Read (MB/s)
14,900
1,050
Sequential Write (MB/s)
13,200
1,000
Random Read (IOPS)
2,200,000
Keine Daten
Random Write (IOPS)
2,400,000
Keine Daten
Hardware
NANDTLCMLC★
DRAM Cache✗—
ControllernCache 4.0—
Reliability
Endurance (TBW)
4,800
Keine Daten
MTBF (hours)
1,750,000
Keine Daten
Warranty (years)5★1
Features
Heatsink✓★—
Hardware Encryption✓✓

Vor- & Nachteile

SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100 8TB PCIe 5.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

  • Strong random (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong speed (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong capacity (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong feature (90th percentile)90th %ile
  • Below average affordability (2nd percentile)2nd %ile

Samsung T7 500GB Portable USB 3.2 Gen 2

  • Strong feature (86th percentile)86th %ile
  • Below average affordability (0th percentile)0th %ile
  • Below average capacity (27th percentile)
  • Below average endurance (34th percentile)

Fazit

★ Gewinner: SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100

Scores 89 overall, wins 5 of 6 usage categories and 10 of 18 specs.

SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100 Besser bei:

BudgetGamingLaptopConsoleWorkstation

Samsung T7 Besser bei:

Portable