SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100

SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100

SanDisk
90 Gesamtbewertung
vs
MSI SPATIUM M560

MSI SPATIUM M560

MSI
66 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Console
SanDisk
86
MSI
61
Workstation
SanDisk
85
MSI
68
Gaming
SanDisk
85
MSI
64
Budget
SanDisk
72
MSI
58
Laptop
SanDisk
66
MSI
67
Portable
SanDisk
24
MSI
17

Spezifikationen

SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100MSI SPATIUM M560
Drive
Capacity
8,000
1,000
Form FactorM.2 2280M.2
InterfacePCIe 5.0 x4PCIe 5.0
ProtocolNVMeNVMe
PCIe Generation55
External✗✗
Performance
Sequential Read (MB/s)
14,900
10,300
Sequential Write (MB/s)
13,200
8,700
Random Read (IOPS)
2,200,000
Keine Daten
Random Write (IOPS)
2,400,000
Keine Daten
Hardware
NANDTLC★—
DRAM Cache✗—
ControllernCache 4.0—
Reliability
Endurance (TBW)
4,800
1,200
MTBF (hours)
1,750,000
Keine Daten
Warranty (years)55
Features
Heatsink✓★—
Hardware Encryption✓✓

Vor- & Nachteile

SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100

  • Strong random (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong speed (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong capacity (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong feature (89th percentile)89th %ile

MSI SPATIUM M560

  • Strong speed (95th percentile)95th %ile
  • Strong endurance (94th percentile)94th %ile

Fazit

★ Gewinner: SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100

Scores 90 overall, wins 5 of 6 usage categories and 9 of 18 specs.

SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100 Besser bei:

BudgetGamingConsolePortableWorkstation