Inland QN460 2TB PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe

Inland QN460 2TB PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe

Inland
70 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Crucial T710 4TB PCIe 5.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

Crucial T710 4TB PCIe 5.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

Crucial
97 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Console
Inland
67
Crucial
96
Gaming
Inland
68
Crucial
94
Workstation
Inland
65
Crucial
89
Laptop
Inland
74
Crucial
82
Budget
Inland
68
Crucial
82
Portable
Inland
18
Crucial
25

Spezifikationen

Inland QN460Crucial T710
Drive
Capacity
2,000
4,000
Form FactorM.2M.2 2280
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x4PCIe 5.0 x4
ProtocolNVMeNVMe
PCIe Generation45★
External✗✗
Performance
Sequential Read (MB/s)
6,000
14,500
Sequential Write (MB/s)
5,600
13,800
Random Read (IOPS)
900,000
2,200,000
Random Write (IOPS)Keine Daten
2,300,000
Hardware
NANDTLCTLC
DRAM Cache✗✗
Controller—Micron
Reliability
Endurance (TBW)Keine Daten
2,400
MTBF (hours)Keine Daten
1,500,000
Warranty (years)6★5
Features
Heatsink✗✓★
Hardware Encryption—✗

Vor- & Nachteile

Inland QN460 2TB PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe

  • Strong random (86th percentile)86th %ile
  • Strong speed (79th percentile)
  • Strong capacity (79th percentile)
  • Strong endurance (65th percentile)
  • Below average affordability (25th percentile)

Crucial T710 4TB PCIe 5.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

  • Strong random (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong speed (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong capacity (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong feature (89th percentile)89th %ile
  • Below average affordability (11th percentile)11th %ile

Fazit

★ Gewinner: Crucial T710

Scores 97 overall, wins 6 of 6 usage categories and 9 of 18 specs.

Crucial T710 Besser bei:

BudgetGamingLaptopConsolePortableWorkstation