G.Skill F3-10600CL9D-8GBNT

G.Skill F3-10600CL9D-8GBNT

G.Skill
32 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Crucial CT16G4DFRA32A

Crucial CT16G4DFRA32A

Crucial
61 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Budget
G.Skill
43
Crucial
75
Gaming
G.Skill
28
Crucial
64
Workstation
G.Skill
29
Crucial
60
Laptop
G.Skill
25
Crucial
45
Server
G.Skill
16
Crucial
28

Spezifikationen

G.Skill F3-10600CL9D-8GBNTCrucial CT16G4DFRA32A
Memory
TypeDDR3DDR4★
Form FactorUDIMMUDIMM
Total Capacity
8,192
16,384
Modules2★1
Per Module
4,096
16,384
Pins240288
Rank—1Rx8
Performance
Speed
1,333
3,200
CAS Latency9★22
Timings9-9-9-2422-22-22
Voltage1.51.2000000476837158★
Class
ECC✗✗
Registered✗✗
OC Profile—Intel XMP 2.0
Features
RGB✗✗
Heat Spreader—✗

Vor- & Nachteile

G.Skill F3-10600CL9D-8GBNT

  • Strong latency (67th percentile)
  • Below average speed (7th percentile)7th %ile
  • Below average capacity (23rd percentile)
  • Below average social proof (35th percentile)

Crucial CT16G4DFRA32A

  • Strong social proof (92nd percentile)92nd %ile

Preise

G.Skill F3-10600CL9D-8GBNT

No current pricing available

Crucial CT16G4DFRA32A

Fazit

★ Gewinner: Crucial CT16G4DFRA32A

Scores 61 overall, wins 5 of 5 usage categories and 5 of 16 specs.

Crucial CT16G4DFRA32A Besser bei:

BudgetGamingLaptopServerWorkstation

Auch in Betracht ziehen