Samsung Galaxy S20 FE Cloud Mint 128GB

Samsung Galaxy S20 FE Cloud Mint 128GB

Samsung
55 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Nokia TA-1667 Titanium 128GB

Nokia TA-1667 Titanium 128GB

Nokia
16 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Rugged
Samsung
64
Nokia
9
Foldable
Samsung
62
Nokia
14
Battery Life
Samsung
55
Nokia
15
Budget
Samsung
55
Nokia
18
Gaming
Samsung
54
Nokia
11
Flagship
Samsung
53
Nokia
10
Photography
Samsung
53
Nokia
7
Compact
Samsung
46
Nokia
15
Business
Samsung
45
Nokia
13

Spezifikationen

Samsung Galaxy S20 FENokia TA-1667
Display
Screen Size6.5
Display TypeSuper AMOLEDLCD
Refresh Rate120 Hz
HDR
Performance
Processor ModelQualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G
CPU Cores8
CPU Speed2.84
RAM6 GB
Storage128 GB128 GB
Expandable
Camera
Main Camera12 MP
Camera Count3
Ultrawide12 MP
Telephoto8 MP
Front Camera32 MP
Battery & Charging
Battery4,500 mAh1,450 mAh
Wired Charging25W
Fast Charging25W Fast Charging
ConnectorUSB-CUSB-C
Connectivity
5G
Wi-FiWi-Fi 6
Bluetooth5.0
NFC
USBUSB-CUSB Type-C
SIMNano-SIMDual SIM
Design & Build
Water ResistanceIP68
Form Factorbarbar
Weight0.09 kg
Face Recognition
OSAndroid
Headphone Jack
Stereo Speakers

Vor- & Nachteile

Samsung Galaxy S20 FE Cloud Mint 128GB

  • Strong build (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong feature (73rd percentile)
  • Strong display (71st percentile)

Nokia TA-1667 Titanium 128GB

  • Below average camera (8th percentile)8th %ile
  • Below average social proof (8th percentile)8th %ile
  • Below average build (15th percentile)15th %ile
  • Below average display (17th percentile)17th %ile

Fazit

Gewinner: Samsung Galaxy S20 FE

Scores 55 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 19 of 32 specs.

Samsung Galaxy S20 FE Besser bei:

BudgetGamingRuggedCompactBusinessFlagshipFoldablePhotographyBattery Life