Aten Technology CL3800 18.5" White
Aten Technology
19 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Dell S2725QC 27" Ash White 2026
Dell
87 Gesamtbewertung
Bewertungen
Office
Professional
Creative
Entertainment
Gaming
Portable
Spezifikationen
| Aten Technology CL3800 18.5" | Dell S2725QC 27" | |
|---|---|---|
| Display | ||
| Size | 18.5" | 27" |
| Resolution | 1920 x 1200 | 3840 x 2160 |
| Panel Type | — | IPS★ |
| Aspect Ratio | 16:10 | 16:9 |
| Curved | ✗ | ✗ |
| Performance | ||
| Refresh Rate | 60 Hz | 120 Hz★ |
| Response Time | — | 8 ms★ |
| Adaptive Sync | — | FreeSync Premium★ |
| Color & HDR | ||
| Brightness | 300 nits | 350 nits★ |
| Color Gamut | — | 99% sRGB |
| HDR | — | HDR |
| HDR Support | — | HDR |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI Ports | 2 | 2 |
| DisplayPort | — | 1★ |
| USB-C | — | 1★ |
| Speakers | — | ✓★ |
| Headphone Jack | — | ✗ |
| Ergonomics | ||
| Height Adjustable | — | ✓★ |
| Tilt | — | ✓★ |
| Swivel | — | ✓★ |
| Pivot | — | ✓★ |
| VESA Mount | — | 100x100 |
| Features | ||
| Webcam | — | ✗ |
| Touchscreen | — | ✗ |
| PIP/PBP | — | ✗ |
| Power | — | 25W★ |
| Weight | 14.51 kg | 6.50 kg★ |
Vor- & Nachteile
Aten Technology CL3800 18.5" White
- Below average social proof (4th percentile)4th %ile
- Below average ergonomic (13th percentile)13th %ile
- Below average performance (22nd percentile)
- Below average feature (23rd percentile)
Dell S2725QC 27" Ash White 2026
- Strong user sentiment (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Strong social proof (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Strong ergonomic (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Strong display (88th percentile)88th %ile
Preise
Aten Technology CL3800 18.5" White0.001Score pro Dollar
vs
Dell S2725QC 27" Ash White 20260.020Score pro Dollar
Dell S2725QC 27" Ash White 2026 bietet 20.0x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
Aten Technology CL3800 18.5" White
Dell S2725QC 27" Ash White 2026
Fazit
Gewinner: Dell S2725QC 27"
Scores 87 overall, wins 6 of 6 usage categories and 14 of 27 specs.
