ASUS ROG Strix XG27AQDMG 26.5" Black 2024
ASUS
96 Gesamtbewertung
vs
LG UltraFine 27UP850N-W 27" Black 2022
LG
79 Gesamtbewertung
Bewertungen
Office
Professional
Gaming
Creative
Entertainment
Portable
Spezifikationen
| ASUS ROG Strix XG27AQDMG 26.5" | LG UltraFine 27UP850N-W 27" | |
|---|---|---|
| Display | ||
| Size | 26.5" | 27" |
| Resolution | 2560 x 1440 | 3840 x 2160 |
| Panel Type | OLED★ | IPS |
| Aspect Ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| Curved | ✗ | ✗ |
| Performance | ||
| Refresh Rate | 240 Hz★ | 60 Hz |
| Response Time | 0.029999999329447746 ms★ | 5 ms |
| Adaptive Sync | FreeSync Premium Pro★ | FreeSync |
| Color & HDR | ||
| Brightness | 450 nits★ | 400 nits |
| Color Gamut | 99% DCI-P3, 135% sRGB | 95% DCI-P3 |
| Color Depth | 10-bit★ | — |
| HDR | HDR10 | DisplayHDR 400 |
| HDR Support | HDR10★ | HDR400 |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI Ports | 2 | 2 |
| DisplayPort | 1 | 1 |
| USB-C | 2★ | 1 |
| Speakers | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Headphone Jack | ✓ | ✓ |
| Ergonomics | ||
| Height Adjustable | ✓ | ✓ |
| Tilt | ✓ | ✓ |
| Swivel | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Pivot | ✓ | ✓ |
| VESA Mount | 100x100 | 100x100 |
| Features | ||
| Webcam | ✗ | ✗ |
| Touchscreen | ✗ | ✗ |
| PIP/PBP | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Power | 25W★ | 44W |
| Weight | 6.70 kg★ | 8.89 kg |
Vor- & Nachteile
ASUS ROG Strix XG27AQDMG 26.5" Black 2024
- Strong performance (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong color (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong user sentiment (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Strong connectivity (95th percentile)95th %ile
LG UltraFine 27UP850N-W 27" Black 2022
- Strong color (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Strong display (90th percentile)90th %ile
- Strong connectivity (90th percentile)90th %ile
- Strong feature (88th percentile)88th %ile
Preise
ASUS ROG Strix XG27AQDMG 26.5" Black 20240.014Score pro Dollar
vs
LG UltraFine 27UP850N-W 27" Black 20220.027Score pro Dollar
LG UltraFine 27UP850N-W 27" Black 2022 bietet 1.9x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
ASUS ROG Strix XG27AQDMG 26.5" Black 2024
LG UltraFine 27UP850N-W 27" Black 2022
Fazit
Gewinner: ASUS ROG Strix XG27AQDMG 26.5"
Scores 96 overall, wins 5 of 6 usage categories and 11 of 28 specs.
