Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS

Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS

Sigma
98 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Canon RF 75-300mm f/4-5.6

Canon RF 75-300mm f/4-5.6

Canon
36 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Macro
Sigma
100
Canon
26
Landscape
Sigma
100
Canon
38
Budget
Sigma
99
Canon
45
Travel
Sigma
93
Canon
43
Video Cinema
Sigma
90
Canon
26
Wildlife Sports
Sigma
87
Canon
37
Portrait
Sigma
85
Canon
18
Professional
Sigma
84
Canon
26
Street
Sigma
80
Canon
32

Spezifikationen

Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OSCanon RF 75-300mm f/4-5.6
Optics
Typezoomtelephoto
Focal Length Min16 mm75 mm
Focal Length Max300 mm300 mm
Elements20—
Groups14—
Aspherical Elements4★—
ED Elements5★—
Coatingwater- and oil-repellent coatingSuper Spectra Coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/3.532-45★
Min Aperture3.5-6.74-5.6
Constant✗✗
Diaphragm Blades9★7
Build
MountSony ECanon RF
FormatAPS-Cfull-frame★
Weather Sealed✓★—
Weight0.61 kg0.45 kg★
Filter Thread67 mm58 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeHLADC
Stabilization✓★✗
Stabilization Stops6 stops★—
Focus
Min Focus Distance170 mm★1.49 m
Max Magnification1:2★0.25x

Vor- & Nachteile

Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS

  • Strong versatility (100th percentile)100th %ile
  • Strong optical (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong macro (88th percentile)88th %ile

Canon RF 75-300mm f/4-5.6

  • Strong versatility (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Below average bokeh (3rd percentile)3rd %ile
  • Below average aperture (5th percentile)5th %ile
  • Below average macro (30th percentile)

Preise

Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS

Canon RF 75-300mm f/4-5.6

No current pricing available

Fazit

★ Gewinner: Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS

Scores 98 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 8 of 22 specs.

Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS Besser bei:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Auch in Betracht ziehen