Sigma Art 35mm f/1.2 DG II 35mm
Sigma
60 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD
Tamron
100 Gesamtbewertung
Bewertungen
Video Cinema
Professional
Budget
Travel
Macro
Portrait
Landscape
Street
Wildlife Sports
Spezifikationen
| Sigma Art 35mm f/1.2 DG II 35mm | Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | prime | zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 35 mm | 17 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 35 mm | 70 mm |
| Elements | 17 | 16 |
| Groups | 13 | 12 |
| Aspherical Elements | 4★ | 3 |
| ED Elements | 1 | 2★ |
| Coating | Water- & Oil-Repellent Coating | Fluorine Coating |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/16 | f/2.8 |
| Min Aperture | f/1.2 | f/2.8 |
| Constant | ✓ | ✓ |
| Diaphragm Blades | 11★ | 9 |
| Build | ||
| Mount | L-Mount | Fujifilm X |
| Format | full-frame★ | APS-C |
| Weather Sealed | ✓ | ✓ |
| Weight | 0.76 kg | 0.54 kg★ |
| Filter Thread | 72 mm | 67 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | HLA-Driven High-Speed AF Motor | RXD |
| Stabilization | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 280 mm | 190 mm★ |
| Max Magnification | 1:5.3 | 1:4.8 |
Vor- & Nachteile
Sigma Art 35mm f/1.2 DG II 35mm
- Strong optical (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Strong macro (75th percentile)
- Below average versatility (33rd percentile)
Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD
- Strong optical (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Strong versatility (89th percentile)89th %ile
- Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong macro (86th percentile)86th %ile
Preise
Sigma Art 35mm f/1.2 DG II 35mm0.004Score pro Dollar
vs
Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD0.022Score pro Dollar
Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD bietet 5.5x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
Sigma Art 35mm f/1.2 DG II 35mm
Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD
Fazit
Gewinner: Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD
Scores 100 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 4 of 21 specs.
