Canon RF 15-35mm f/2.8L IS USM
Canon
80 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD
Tamron
100 Gesamtbewertung
Bewertungen
Video Cinema
Professional
Budget
Travel
Macro
Portrait
Landscape
Street
Wildlife Sports
Spezifikationen
| Canon RF 15-35mm f/2.8L IS USM | Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | zoom | zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 15 mm | 17 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 35 mm | 70 mm |
| Elements | 16 | 16 |
| Groups | 12 | 12 |
| Aspherical Elements | 3 | 3 |
| ED Elements | 2 | 2 |
| Coating | Air-Sphere coating, Fluorine coating | Fluorine Coating |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/22 | f/2.8 |
| Min Aperture | f/2.8 | f/2.8 |
| Constant | ✓ | ✓ |
| Diaphragm Blades | 9 | 9 |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Canon RF | Fujifilm X |
| Format | full-frame★ | APS-C |
| Weather Sealed | ✓ | ✓ |
| Weight | 0.84 kg | 0.54 kg★ |
| Filter Thread | 82 mm | 67 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | Nano USM★ | RXD |
| Stabilization | ✓ | ✓ |
| Stabilization Stops | 5 stops★ | — |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 280 mm | 190 mm★ |
| Max Magnification | 0.21x | 1:4.8★ |
Vor- & Nachteile
Canon RF 15-35mm f/2.8L IS USM
- Strong social proof (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong stabilization (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong af (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Strong optical (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Below average aperture (21st percentile)
- Below average bokeh (24th percentile)
Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD
- Strong optical (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Strong versatility (89th percentile)89th %ile
- Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong macro (86th percentile)86th %ile
Preise
Canon RF 15-35mm f/2.8L IS USM0.004Score pro Dollar
vs
Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD0.022Score pro Dollar
Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD bietet 5.5x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
Canon RF 15-35mm f/2.8L IS USM
Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD
Fazit
Gewinner: Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD
Scores 100 overall, wins 7 of 9 usage categories and 3 of 22 specs.
