Tamron Di AFA037N700 17-35mm

Tamron Di AFA037N700 17-35mm

Tamron
67 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM

Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM

Canon
91 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Budget
Tamron
64
Canon
97
Portrait
Tamron
72
Canon
95
Video Cinema
Tamron
60
Canon
90
Street
Tamron
64
Canon
82
Travel
Tamron
62
Canon
81
Wildlife Sports
Tamron
64
Canon
77
Landscape
Tamron
58
Canon
76
Professional
Tamron
65
Canon
75
Macro
Tamron
66
Canon
68

Spezifikationen

Tamron Di AFA037N700 17-35mmCanon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM
Optics
Typewide-anglezoom
Focal Length Min17 mm18 mm
Focal Length Max35 mm135 mm
Elements16
Groups12
Aspherical Elements1
ED Elements1
Coatingprotective fluorine compoundSuper Spectra Coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/2.8f/3.5
Min Aperture2.8-43.5-5.6
Constant
Diaphragm Blades7
Build
MountNikon FCanon EF-S
FormatAPS-C
Weather Sealed
Weight0.46 kg0.52 kg
Filter Thread67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeOSDSTM
Stabilization
Stabilization Stops4 stops
Focus
Min Focus Distance280 mm390 mm
Max Magnification0.28x

Vor- & Nachteile

Tamron Di AFA037N700 17-35mm

  • Strong aperture (85th percentile)85th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
  • Strong bokeh (82nd percentile)82nd %ile
  • Strong macro (75th percentile)

Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM

  • Strong versatility (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong optical (82nd percentile)82nd %ile

Fazit

Gewinner: Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM

Scores 91 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 7 of 22 specs.

Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM Besser bei:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports