spovan HPL-N-2

spovan HPL-N-2

spovan
39 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM

Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM

Canon
91 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Budget
spovan
43
Canon
97
Portrait
spovan
56
Canon
95
Video Cinema
spovan
50
Canon
90
Street
spovan
60
Canon
82
Travel
spovan
45
Canon
81
Wildlife Sports
spovan
48
Canon
77
Landscape
spovan
33
Canon
76
Professional
spovan
45
Canon
75
Macro
spovan
26
Canon
68

Spezifikationen

spovan HPL-N-2Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM
Optics
Typeprimezoom
Focal Length Min0 mm18 mm
Focal Length Max0 mm135 mm
Elements16
Groups12
Aspherical Elements1
ED Elements1
CoatingSuper Spectra Coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/3.5
Min Aperture3.5-5.6
Constant
Diaphragm Blades7
Build
MountNikon FCanon EF-S
FormatAPS-C
Weather Sealed
Weight0.05 kg0.52 kg
Filter Thread67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeSTM
Stabilization
Stabilization Stops4 stops
Focus
Min Focus Distance390 mm
Max Magnification0.28x

Vor- & Nachteile

spovan HPL-N-2

  • Strong build (100th percentile)100th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
  • Strong aperture (67th percentile)
  • Strong bokeh (66th percentile)
  • Below average user sentiment (0th percentile)0th %ile
  • Below average social proof (10th percentile)10th %ile
  • Below average macro (14th percentile)14th %ile
  • Below average optical (21st percentile)

Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM

  • Strong versatility (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong optical (82nd percentile)82nd %ile

Preise

spovan HPL-N-2

Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM

No current pricing available

Fazit

Gewinner: Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM

Scores 91 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 8 of 22 specs.

Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM Besser bei:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Auch in Betracht ziehen