Sigma 529969

Sigma 529969

Sigma
96 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Zeiss Batis 000000-2136-695 135mm

Zeiss Batis 000000-2136-695 135mm

Zeiss
72 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Professional
Sigma
99
Zeiss
80
Budget
Sigma
96
Zeiss
69
Portrait
Sigma
93
Zeiss
81
Macro
Sigma
92
Zeiss
47
Street
Sigma
91
Zeiss
69
Video Cinema
Sigma
87
Zeiss
77
Landscape
Sigma
83
Zeiss
60
Travel
Sigma
83
Zeiss
54
Wildlife Sports
Sigma
82
Zeiss
66

Spezifikationen

Sigma 529969Zeiss Batis 000000-2136-695 135mm
Optics
Typezoomtelephoto
Focal Length Min28 mm135 mm
Focal Length Max70 mm135 mm
Elements1614
Groups1211
Aspherical Elements3
ED Elements4
CoatingSuper Multi-Layer Coating and Nano Porous CoatingZEISS T* coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/2.8f/2.8
Min Aperturef/2.8f/2.8
Constant
Diaphragm Blades9
Build
MountSony ESony E
Formatfull-framefull-frame
Weather Sealed
Weight0.47 kg0.61 kg
Filter Thread67 mm67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeStepping motorAutofocus
Stabilization
Focus
Min Focus Distance190 mm
Max Magnification3.3 to 4.6 x

Vor- & Nachteile

Sigma 529969

  • Strong macro (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong optical (95th percentile)95th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile

Zeiss Batis 000000-2136-695 135mm

  • Strong social proof (86th percentile)86th %ile
  • Strong aperture (84th percentile)84th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
  • Strong bokeh (82nd percentile)82nd %ile
  • Below average macro (14th percentile)14th %ile
  • Below average versatility (33rd percentile)

Preise

Sigma 529969 is 9.529 R$ cheaper (2.9x less).

Sigma 5299690.019Score pro Dollar
vs
Zeiss Batis 000000-2136-695 135mm0.005Score pro Dollar

Sigma 529969 bietet 3.8x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis

Zeiss Batis 000000-2136-695 135mm

Fazit

Gewinner: Sigma 529969

Scores 96 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 7 of 21 specs.

Sigma 529969 Besser bei:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Auch in Betracht ziehen