Viltrox AF AF 56/1.7 Z 56mm

Viltrox AF AF 56/1.7 Z 56mm

Viltrox
71 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Nikon HPL-N

Nikon HPL-N

Nikon
40 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Street
Viltrox
75
Nikon
60
Portrait
Viltrox
69
Nikon
60
Budget
Viltrox
66
Nikon
43
Wildlife Sports
Viltrox
65
Nikon
49
Professional
Viltrox
60
Nikon
47
Video Cinema
Viltrox
60
Nikon
54
Macro
Viltrox
59
Nikon
25
Travel
Viltrox
59
Nikon
45
Landscape
Viltrox
56
Nikon
31

Spezifikationen

Viltrox AF AF 56/1.7 Z 56mmNikon HPL-N
Optics
Typeprimeprime
Focal Length Min56 mm
Focal Length Max56 mm
Elements11
Groups9
ED Elements4
CoatingHD nano-coating
Aperture
Max Aperture16
Min Aperture1.7
Constant
Diaphragm Blades9
Build
MountSony ENikon F
FormatAPS-C
Weight0.17 kg0.05 kg
Filter Thread52 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeSTM
Stabilization
Focus
Min Focus Distance550 mm
Max Magnification1:9.09

Vor- & Nachteile

Viltrox AF AF 56/1.7 Z 56mm

  • Strong af (86th percentile)86th %ile
  • Strong build (86th percentile)86th %ile
  • Strong social proof (78th percentile)
  • Strong optical (68th percentile)
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Nikon HPL-N

  • Strong build (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (81th percentile)81th %ile
  • Strong aperture (73th percentile)
  • Strong bokeh (72th percentile)
  • Below average user sentiment (0th percentile)0th %ile
  • Below average macro (8th percentile)8th %ile
  • Below average social proof (10th percentile)10th %ile
  • Below average optical (15th percentile)15th %ile

Preise

Nikon HPL-N is 885 R$ cheaper (8.2x less).

Viltrox AF AF 56/1.7 Z 56mm0.070Score pro Dollar
vs
Nikon HPL-N0.330Score pro Dollar

Nikon HPL-N bietet 4.7x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis

Viltrox AF AF 56/1.7 Z 56mm

Fazit

Gewinner: Viltrox AF AF 56/1.7 Z 56mm

Scores 71 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 7 of 19 specs.

Viltrox AF AF 56/1.7 Z 56mm Besser bei:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Auch in Betracht ziehen