Laowa Zero-D 12mm f/2.8 12mm

Laowa Zero-D 12mm f/2.8 12mm

Laowa
56 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM

Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM

Canon
91 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Budget
Laowa
51
Canon
97
Portrait
Laowa
73
Canon
95
Video Cinema
Laowa
50
Canon
90
Street
Laowa
56
Canon
82
Travel
Laowa
33
Canon
81
Wildlife Sports
Laowa
37
Canon
77
Landscape
Laowa
50
Canon
76
Professional
Laowa
53
Canon
75
Macro
Laowa
57
Canon
68

Spezifikationen

Laowa Zero-D 12mm f/2.8 12mmCanon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM
Optics
Typeultra-wide-anglezoom
Focal Length Min12 mm18 mm
Focal Length Max12 mm135 mm
Elements1616
Groups1012
Aspherical Elements21
ED Elements31
CoatingFrog Eye CoatingSuper Spectra Coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/2.8f/3.5
Min Aperturef/223.5-5.6
Constant
Diaphragm Blades77
Build
MountCanon EFCanon EF-S
FormatFull-FrameAPS-C
Weather Sealed
Weight0.61 kg0.52 kg
Filter Thread72 mm67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF Typemanual focus onlySTM
Stabilization
Stabilization Stops4 stops
Focus
Min Focus Distance180 mm390 mm
Max Magnification0.2x0.28x

Vor- & Nachteile

Laowa Zero-D 12mm f/2.8 12mm

  • Strong optical (89th percentile)89th %ile
  • Strong aperture (85th percentile)85th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (82nd percentile)82nd %ile
  • Strong social proof (81st percentile)81st %ile
  • Below average af (13th percentile)13th %ile
  • Below average versatility (33rd percentile)

Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM

  • Strong versatility (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong optical (82nd percentile)82nd %ile

Fazit

Gewinner: Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM

Scores 91 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 5 of 22 specs.

Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM Besser bei:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports