HOLGA HL-N 60mm
HOLGA
29 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Viltrox AF AF 28/4.5 Z 28mm
Viltrox
69 Gesamtbewertung
Bewertungen
Street
Professional
Travel
Portrait
Budget
Landscape
Wildlife Sports
Video Cinema
Macro
Spezifikationen
| HOLGA HL-N 60mm | Viltrox AF AF 28/4.5 Z 28mm | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | standard | prime |
| Focal Length Min | 60 mm | 28 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 60 mm | 28 mm |
| Elements | — | 6 |
| Groups | — | 6 |
| Aspherical Elements | — | 2★ |
| ED Elements | — | 2★ |
| Coating | — | multilayer nanocoating |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/8 | f/4.5 |
| Min Aperture | f/8 | f/4.5 |
| Constant | ✓ | ✓ |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Nikon F | Sony E |
| Format | — | full-frame★ |
| Weather Sealed | — | ✓★ |
| Weight | — | 0.06 kg★ |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | manual focus only | Autofocus |
| Stabilization | — | ✗ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | — | 350 mm★ |
| Max Magnification | — | 1:10★ |
Vor- & Nachteile
HOLGA HL-N 60mm
- Below average macro (8th percentile)8th %ile
- Below average optical (15th percentile)15th %ile
- Below average af (15th percentile)15th %ile
- Below average build (27th percentile)
Viltrox AF AF 28/4.5 Z 28mm
- Strong build (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong social proof (74th percentile)
- Strong aperture (67th percentile)
- Strong bokeh (66th percentile)
- Below average versatility (34th percentile)
Preise
HOLGA HL-N 60mm0.235Score pro Dollar
vs
Viltrox AF AF 28/4.5 Z 28mm0.133Score pro Dollar
HOLGA HL-N 60mm bietet 1.8x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
HOLGA HL-N 60mm
Viltrox AF AF 28/4.5 Z 28mm
Fazit
Gewinner: Viltrox AF AF 28/4.5 Z 28mm
Scores 69 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 7 of 19 specs.
