Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm
Sigma
91 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Leica APO Elmar-S 11071 180mm
Leica
27 Gesamtbewertung
Bewertungen
Professional
Portrait
Street
Budget
Video Cinema
Macro
Wildlife Sports
Landscape
Travel
Spezifikationen
| Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm | Leica APO Elmar-S 11071 180mm | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | zoom | prime |
| Focal Length Min | 16 mm | 180 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 28 mm | 180 mm |
| Elements | 16 | 9 |
| Groups | 11 | 7 |
| Aspherical Elements | 4★ | — |
| ED Elements | 5★ | — |
| Coating | Super Multi-Layer Coating | — |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/2.8 | f/3.5 |
| Min Aperture | f/2.8 | f/3.5 |
| Constant | ✓ | ✓ |
| Diaphragm Blades | 9★ | — |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Sony E | Leica S |
| Format | full-frame★ | medium-format |
| Weather Sealed | ✓ | ✓ |
| Weight | 0.45 kg★ | 1.15 kg |
| Filter Thread | 72 mm | — |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | Stepping AF Motor | Automatic/manual |
| Stabilization | ✗ | — |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 250 mm★ | 1.52 m |
| Max Magnification | 1:5.55★ | — |
Vor- & Nachteile
Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm
- Strong optical (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong aperture (84th percentile)84th %ile
Leica APO Elmar-S 11071 180mm
- Strong aperture (78th percentile)
- Strong bokeh (76th percentile)
- Below average social proof (3rd percentile)3rd %ile
- Below average build (12th percentile)12th %ile
- Below average af (13th percentile)13th %ile
- Below average versatility (33rd percentile)
Fazit
Gewinner: Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm
Scores 91 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 7 of 21 specs.