Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm

Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm

Sigma
91 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Simmod APSARA LUMIERE 35mm T1.4 Super Speed 35mm

Simmod APSARA LUMIERE 35mm T1.4 Super Speed 35mm

Simmod
52 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Professional
Sigma
98
Simmod
48
Portrait
Sigma
90
Simmod
66
Street
Sigma
88
Simmod
52
Budget
Sigma
85
Simmod
45
Video Cinema
Sigma
85
Simmod
51
Macro
Sigma
83
Simmod
59
Wildlife Sports
Sigma
80
Simmod
40
Landscape
Sigma
77
Simmod
33
Travel
Sigma
75
Simmod
28

Spezifikationen

Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mmSimmod APSARA LUMIERE 35mm T1.4 Super Speed 35mm
Optics
Typezoom
Focal Length Min16 mm35 mm
Focal Length Max28 mm35 mm
Elements1614
Groups1111
Aspherical Elements4
ED Elements5
CoatingSuper Multi-Layer Coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/2.8
Min Aperturef/2.8
Constant
Diaphragm Blades912
Build
MountSony ENikon Z
Formatfull-frameLarge Format (43.3 mm Image Circle)
Weather Sealed
Weight0.45 kg0.68 kg
Filter Thread72 mm77 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeStepping AF Motor
Stabilization
Focus
Min Focus Distance250 mm300 mm
Max Magnification1:5.551:6.67

Vor- & Nachteile

Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm

  • Strong optical (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong aperture (85th percentile)85th %ile

Simmod APSARA LUMIERE 35mm T1.4 Super Speed 35mm

  • Strong bokeh (86th percentile)86th %ile
  • Strong macro (71st percentile)
  • Strong aperture (67th percentile)
  • Below average versatility (33rd percentile)

Fazit

Gewinner: Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm

Scores 91 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 7 of 21 specs.

Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm Besser bei:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports