XIAOWTEK S58

XIAOWTEK S58

XIAOWTEK
71 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Skullcandy Jib S2DUYK-343

Skullcandy Jib S2DUYK-343

Skullcandy
36 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Gaming
XIAOWTEK
76
Skullcandy
23
Budget
XIAOWTEK
73
Skullcandy
43
Music
XIAOWTEK
65
Skullcandy
16
Calls
XIAOWTEK
57
Skullcandy
19
Commute
XIAOWTEK
57
Skullcandy
18
Travel
XIAOWTEK
57
Skullcandy
19
Fitness
XIAOWTEK
42
Skullcandy
37

Spezifikationen

XIAOWTEK S58Skullcandy Jib S2DUYK-343
Design
Form Factorin-earin-ear
Wearing Styletrue wirelesstrue wireless
Ear TipslMedium, Small
Weight0.09 kg0.01 kg
Audio
Driver Typedynamicdynamic
Driver Size13 mm3.5 mm
Impedance16 Ω
Hi-Res Audio
CodecsAAC, SBC, aptX AdaptiveSkullcandy Jib Wired Earbuds with 3.5mm AUX Plug, Noise Isolating Fit, In-Line Microphone Call and Track Control, Convenient for Travel - Black
Noise Control
ANC
Transparency
Connectivity
Wireless
Bluetooth5.45.0
Multipoint
Wired ConnectorBluetooth3.5mm
Earbud Battery
Battery Life6 hrs6 hrs
Chargingproprietary
Case Battery
Case Battery50 hrs
Case Chargingproprietary
Wireless Charging
Microphone
Microphone
Mic Count4
NC Mic
Features
Voice AssistantSiri, Google Assistant
Touch Controls
Gaming Mode
Bone Conduction
Water ResistanceIPX7Water-Resistant

Vor- & Nachteile

XIAOWTEK S58

  • Strong social proof (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong sound (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong mic (90th percentile)90th %ile
  • Strong connectivity (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Below average build (34th percentile)

Skullcandy Jib S2DUYK-343

  • Strong comfort (93th percentile)93th %ile
  • Strong social proof (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong build (70th percentile)
  • Below average sound (2th percentile)2th %ile
  • Below average battery (9th percentile)9th %ile
  • Below average anc (29th percentile)
  • Below average mic (35th percentile)

Fazit

Gewinner: XIAOWTEK S58

Scores 71 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 9 of 28 specs.

XIAOWTEK S58 Besser bei:

CallsMusicBudgetGamingTravelCommuteFitness