MSI Codex Z2 A8NVM-485US

MSI Codex Z2 A8NVM-485US

MSI
80 Gesamtbewertung
vs
HP ProDesk 600 G5

HP ProDesk 600 G5

HP
40 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Home Office
MSI
80
HP
43
Gaming
MSI
75
HP
7
Business
MSI
72
HP
48
Workstation
MSI
72
HP
34
Creator
MSI
71
HP
14
Developer
MSI
71
HP
37
Ai Llm
MSI
46
HP
13
Compact
MSI
27
HP
39

Spezifikationen

MSI Codex Z2 A8NVM-485USHP ProDesk 600 G5
Processor
CPUAMD Ryzen 7 8700Fi5-9500
CPU Multi-Core Score
30,931
Keine Daten
Cores86
Frequency4.1 GHz3.0 GHz
L3 Cache16 MB
Graphics
GPUNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Tiintegrated graphics chip
GPU Benchmark Score
20,712
Keine Daten
Typediscreteintegrated
VRAM8 GB
VRAM TypeGDDR7
Memory & Storage
RAM16 GB16 GB
RAM GenerationDDR5
Storage 12 TB512 GB
Storage 1 TypeNVMe SSDSSD
Build
Form Factormid-towersff
PSU650W
Weight12.88 kg
Connectivity
USB-C Ports1
USB Ports8
HDMI1x HDMIHDMI
DisplayPort3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Wi-FiWi-Fi 6E
BluetoothBluetooth 5.3
EthernetGigabit Ethernet
System
OSWindows 11 HomeWindows 10 Pro

Vor- & Nachteile

MSI Codex Z2 A8NVM-485US

  • Strong storage (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
  • Strong social proof (90th percentile)90th %ile
  • Strong port selection (89th percentile)89th %ile
  • Strong gpu (73rd percentile)

HP ProDesk 600 G5

  • Strong reliability (71st percentile)
  • Below average gpu (10th percentile)10th %ile
  • Below average port selection (18th percentile)18th %ile
  • Below average ram (31st percentile)
  • Below average storage (32nd percentile)

Fazit

Gewinner: MSI Codex Z2 A8NVM-485US

Scores 80 overall, wins 7 of 8 usage categories and 16 of 25 specs.

MSI Codex Z2 A8NVM-485US Besser bei:

Ai LlmGamingCreatorBusinessDeveloperHome OfficeWorkstation

HP ProDesk 600 G5 Besser bei:

Compact