In G4400T

In G4400T

In
16 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Intel BX80768225

Intel BX80768225

Intel
88 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Efficiency
In
18
Intel
96
Budget
In
20
Intel
93
Productivity
In
14
Intel
91
Ai Llm
In
8
Intel
82
Gaming
In
18
Intel
80
Server
In
10
Intel
74

Spezifikationen

In G4400TIntel BX80768225
Processor
BrandIntelIntel
SeriesPentiumCore Ultra 5
ModelG4400T225
CodenameSkylakeArrow Lake
Classdesktopdesktop
Process—3★
Cores & Clocks
Cores210★
P-cores—6★
E-cores—4★
Threads210★
Base Clock
2,900
3,300
Boost ClockKeine Daten
4,900
Cache
L2 Cache—22★
L3 Cache—20★
Performance
PassMark MultiKeine Daten
30,504
PassMark SingleKeine Daten
4,414
Memory
Memory Type—DDR5★
Max SpeedKeine Daten
6,400
Channels—2★
Max MemoryKeine Daten
192
ECC—✗
Platform & Power
SocketLGA1151LGA 1851
PCIe—5.0
PCIe Lanes—24★
TDP35★65
Max Turbo Power—121★
Unlocked✗✗
Graphics & AI
Integrated Graphics—Intel Graphics
NPU TOPS—13★

Vor- & Nachteile

In G4400T

  • Below average ai (10th percentile)10th %ile
  • Below average multi thread (12th percentile)12th %ile
  • Below average platform (18th percentile)18th %ile
  • Below average efficiency (19th percentile)19th %ile

Intel BX80768225

  • Strong efficiency (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong single thread (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong feature (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong platform (91st percentile)91st %ile

Preise

In G4400T is 1.507 R$ cheaper (7.3x less).

In G4400T0.065Score pro Dollar
vs
Intel BX807682250.050Score pro Dollar

In G4400T bietet 1.3x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis

In G4400T

Intel BX80768225

Fazit

★ Gewinner: Intel BX80768225

Scores 88 overall, wins 6 of 6 usage categories and 18 of 29 specs.

Intel BX80768225 Besser bei:

Ai LlmBudgetGamingServerEfficiencyProductivity

Auch in Betracht ziehen